270
17 Utilization of Microbial Potential for Bioethanol Production from Lignocellulosic Waste
Table 17.1
(Continued)
Sl. No. Pretreatment
Nature
Intermediate
operation
Advantages
Disadvantages
References
9.
Ammonium
fiber
explosion
Physico-
chemical
Liquid
ammonia at
high pressure
and
temperature
Swelling and
phase change in
cellulose
crystallinity,
modification of
lignin to increase
water holding
capacity and
degradability
Ammonia
could be
recovered, no
inhibitor
formation
[10]
10.
Whole cell or
enzyme
mediated
Biological White-rot fungi,
Brown-rot
fungi, bacteria,
and archaea
Energy efficient,
lignin and
hemicellulose
degradation,
economically
sound
Lower
hydrolysis rate
[2]
sugarcane bagasse rice straw, bamboo, wheat straw, cotton stalk, and sugarcane tops
are a few of the largely available agro-wastes. Most of these by-products are used for
the production of bioethanol [4].
Pretreatment of bioethanol generally uses bacterial strains or their enzymes. This
strategy is attracting consideration because of its capacity to work in the moderately
shorter response time, not only that, but also it needs low sustenance prerequisite
for the enzymatic responses [6, 8]. A few microorganisms, for example, Clostridium
sp., Cellulomonas sp., Bacillus sp., Thermomonospora sp., Streptomyces sp. and so
forth., and a few parasites such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Trichoderma reesei,
Trichoderma viride, Aspergillus niger are generally utilized in natural pretreatment
process [7, 9]. By utilizing the sugars, cellulose and hemicellulose degrading
microorganisms typically hydrolyze the complex molecules to monomeric sugars
[10]. Most significant benefits of natural strategies incorporate no compound
reusing after pretreatment, lower downstream handling charges, least inhibitor
arrangement, straightforward working, and lower vitality utilization [11]. In any
case, the amazingly low pace of hydrolysis is the principle hindrance in creating
bioprocessing (BP) strategies [12]. Furthermore, microscopic organisms can create
hydrolytic and oxidative catalysts which can break down unbending structures
of LCBs. Cellulase is the enzyme that is primarily added, and then 𝛽-glucosidase
and xylanase are added [13]. In light of the past investigations, enzyme-mediated
pretreatment improves the methane content more than 100%; consequently, the
viability of enzymatic pretreatment is dictated by various elements [14].
Fungal pretreatment requires higher brooding time, while enzymatic and bacterial
pretreatments need a couple of hours to end. Contagious pretreatment diminishes
the unmanageability of structure of LCBs [15]. For instance, Trametes versicolor has
been utilized for BP of grain harvests, for example, wheat, rye, and grain before